⚔️ ARCHITECTURAL SHOWDOWN5-Pillar Quality Index v1
infervsstategraph
Empirical side-by-side telemetry and architectural trade-off audit. Evaluated deterministically from git commit cadence, release recency, test automation, and security posture.
⚔️ Interactive Matchup Controls• Swap any framework to generate instant comparison
Competitor 1
VS
Competitor 2
Popular Rivalries:
👑 HIGHEST COMPOSITE SCORE
facebook/
infer
5-PILLAR QUALITY
61/100
Grade B
62% confidence
⭐ 15.7k stars
🔀 2.1k forks
💻 OCaml
📜 MIT License
5-Pillar Dual Radar Face-Off
infer
stategraph
stategraph/
stategraph
5-PILLAR QUALITY
48/100
Grade C
86% confidence
⭐ 1.3k stars
🔀 84 forks
💻 OCaml
📜 Mozilla Public License 2.0
Granular Telemetry Audit
5-Pillar Differential Matrix
Side-by-side points breakdown across the 5 canonical dimensions of open-source repository health.
⚡Maintenance & Release Velocity(Max 25 pts)
★ stategraph +3.6 pts advantage
infer11.2 / 25
stategraph14.8 / 25
infer: Managed issue backlog: 262 open issues relative to adoption scale
stategraph: Active development: pushed within the last 0 days
👥Community & Ecosystem Adoption(Max 25 pts)
★ infer +4.8 pts advantage
infer20.7 / 25
stategraph15.9 / 25
infer: Established ecosystem adoption: 15,733 stars
stategraph: Proven community traction: 1,308 stars
🏛️Architecture & Code Integrity(Max 20 pts)
★ infer +1.5 pts advantage
infer9.5 / 20
stategraph8 / 20
infer: Standard OSI-approved license: MIT License
stategraph: Custom / non-standard license: Mozilla Public License 2.0
📖Documentation & Developer Experience(Max 15 pts)
★ infer +9 pts advantage
infer11.5 / 15
stategraph2.5 / 15
infer: Clear installation guide with runnable package manager commands
stategraph: Defined project description
🛡️Security, Risk & Sustainability(Max 15 pts)
★ infer +1 pts advantage
infer8 / 15
stategraph7 / 15
infer: Commercially permissive open-source license (MIT License)
stategraph: Zero known critical CVEs reported in dependency footprint
Engineering Decision Guide
Which Should You Choose: infer or stategraph?
✓ Choose infer If:
- Your stack requires OCaml standard tooling and runtime conventions.
- Your team values global market mindshare and larger talent pool.
- You prioritize its MIT License licensing terms for proprietary enterprise distribution.
- You need verified maintenance cadence (11.2/25 pts in velocity).
✓ Choose stategraph If:
- Your application architecture is built around OCaml.
- You prefer its modular footprint and release update cadence (14.8/25 pts).
- You want to take advantage of its documentation ecosystem (2.5/15 pts).
- Your team is seeking active issue resolution with low maintainer stagnation.
🔥 Sarcastic Autopsy Share Cards
Share a Diagnostic Autopsy for Either Competitor
Generate a scroll-stopping share card with rubber stamps, maintainer sanity gauges, and diagnostic burns.